One day a few years ago, when I was still teaching eighth-graders, a guest speaker came in to talk to my students as part of an annual school-sponsored event.
He opened his talk with a declaration: “You kids don’t need to worry about a thing,” he said, “because you all already live in the greatest country in the world!”
Out of courtesy to him - and because if one, even out of passive curiosity, questions such a remark, then that person shall instantaneously vilifiy himself to a dangerously unknown degree - I merely smiled and nodded along with the other adults in the room.
A little later, though, I wondered whether I should have at least spoken up during the question-and-answer session. After all, the speaker based his viewpoint on his time at an American military base in South Korea - not a particularly compelling measure, really. Besides, my students were very bright, and they had only recently read Frederick Douglass’s narrative about his life as a slave in the 1800s, and they were well aware that Douglass, for one, would certainly have disagreed with our speaker.
Also, I had openly discussed with them the steady decline in the American educational system, using cold hard facts such as the results of comparative international testing in reading and math. This was not for the purpose of discouraging them, but simply because we cannot begin to treat a problem until we have seen it in the harsh light of objectivity. The chance for change and improvement begins with the efforts of every teacher, every student, every parent.
I have written about these matters in previous posts. From a broader perspective, others who might have disagreed with the speaker (albeit some of them from the grave) would have included noteworthy Americans such as Josephine Baker, Ernest Hemingway, James Baldwin, T.S. Eliot, and current popular writers such as David Sedaris and Sarah Lieberman. That is merely a handful of famous names; many, many Americans, over our history, have left this country and lived abroad for various reasons. Many more continue to do so, not because they are socialists or communist sympathizers or terrorist recruits, but because they choose to live and work in another country, and in so doing they may come to better understand themselves and their own origins. These people are called expatriates.
The word comes from an old French verb. Originally, to be expatriated meant to be banished from one’s own country, but by the early twentieth century, it was also in use as a noun. Further, its meaning had changed to imply a willful exit from one’s homeland, rather than exile. By comparison, the word emigrant, then, merely describes a physical process, a change in geographical location, whereas expatriate suggests an attitude.
Of course, patriot is a related word which we use to express the admirable condition of loyalty to one’s country and the willingness to sacrifice for it. Expatriates can also be patriots, certainly (the ex- prefix, in this case, does not infer ‘former,’ as in ex-husband; instead it suggests ‘out’ or ‘outer’). For instance, many of the British and American expat writers and artists who chose to return to France in the 1920s had been soldiers in the great bloodbath of World War I (Hemingway called it a “colossal, murderous, mismanaged butchery”).
Anyway, that is enough etymology. The more interesting question is “Why do people leave?” Is it because the food and wine are so much better in northern Italy, or because English pubs are so cozy, or because it is so pleasant sitting at a cafe table on the Boulevard St. Germaine, listening to the lilting conversation all around? In some cases, yes, it is just that simple. Historically, though, for others the reasons have been more complex and more sobering. Some of those WWI vets had been shattered by their experiences - they were searching for their own lost souls, and they felt they had little in common with friends and family back home who could not conceive of what it had been like for them, so that they sought out their fellows in faraway places. Ironically, expatriation has sometimes led to a redeeming camaraderie.
Then there have been those who have left because they became sickened by something that had taken place in their own country. What a tragedy it must be to learn to love a place and then be compelled to leave it for some circumstance over which you have no control. Perhaps greed and the ugliness it brings to a place are the cause of such spiritual illness. The wonderful neighborhood where you roamed as a child somehow turned into strip malls and noxious industrial zones. Visit any moderately-sized American city, and you will see what I mean: economic overdevelopment and sundry real-estate boons have brought about the uglification of a beautiful land. It is a predictable transformation, and yet it happens over and over again.
Capitalism is the most moral of economic systems - so long as those practicing it are also moral. It places great faith in the individual; it is up to the owner of a business to be not merely ambitious but also fair, honest, empathetic, and courteous; others depend upon him or her for their livings, and for their safety and sustenance. It all goes hand in hand with democratic principles. Yet, as we have often seen, the individual human is fallible. And so are governments.
Would I gripe about paying higher taxes in a country such as…oh, say, Spain? Yes, I would. I am a very good complainer. An expert, in fact. There, taxes are substantially higher (e.g., at the gas pump) than in the U.S., and yet I tell you, I have been in towns in Andalusia where the benefits of fair taxation are well represented, with busy public employees scrubbing away, freshly washed streets glistening in the morning light, with rows of fragrant, trimmed orange trees along them, where magnificent old buildings are restored and preserved rather than bulldozed, and clean, efficient mass transit is ubiquitous. And tidiness is contagious, it would seem: residents in the smallest, humblest houses and apartments keep them looking spiffy under the brilliant Spanish sun. Is this socialism? I am not a political scientist, but my understanding is that in truly socialist countries, the citizenry does not generally benefit from the money siphoned away from them, though someone does (read as oligarchy).
Still, having never lived abroad, I do not know what day-to-day life would be like in a foreign country. I have often thought that I would like to find out. If nothing else, the experience might contribute to a stronger sense of my own national identity, a clearer idea of where we all came from and who we want to be - even if we have somehow lost our way. Then perhaps, having been there and back again, what a joy it might be afterward to hear a familiar voice saying, “Welcome home.”